Search icon

Introduction to the problem and scale

Wild fish live free, but the methods of capture and processing are often industrial, with no considerations for their welfare; the potential for suffering is therefore huge.

  • In 2022, 78 million tonnes of fish were caught from the wild, consisting of between 940 billion and 1.9 trillion individual fish1. This compares with around 80 billion terrestrial animals slaughtered for food each year2.
  • The vast majority of fish stocks are considered by the FAO to be overfished (37.7%) or fully exploited (~50%)3.
  • By tonnage, around 20% of these wild caught fish are  ground down to fishmeal and oil each year4. However as the fish used are so small, it is a much higher percentage in terms of numbers of individuals – around half are used for this purpose instead of being eaten directly by people5. Most fishmeal and oil is used as ingredients in farmed fish feeds.
  • Wild-caught fish typically die from injuries during capture and landing, or from asphyxiation (suffocation) in air, on ice or in iced-water6 when on board, and they may be bled by the gills without pre-stunning. These are all methods which the World Organisation for Animal Health acknowledges to result in poor fish welfare7..
  • Many wild fish are processed - for example, gutted - whilst still alive. One Dutch study which examined fishing for herring, cod, whiting, sole, dab and plaice, showed that the fish took 55-250 minutes to die from asphyxiation. Those who were gutted first remained conscious for 25-65 minutes8.
  • Cephalopods such as octopus and squid and decapods such as lobster, crabs, and prawns, are also caught in enormous numbers not yet estimated. According to EFSA, there is good evidence for sentiency in these creatures9. Cephalopods may be left to die en masse in a net or other container, sometimes chilled; or killed with blunt trauma, mantle inversion, or through damage to the brain10.
dying wild fish on a trawling vessel

Higher welfare alternatives

More humane methods of capture and slaughter of wild fish are being developed, though currently their use is very rare.

Traditional methods of stunning before slaughter include mechanical stunning (e.g. a blow to the head) or spiking (where the brain is destroyed with a sharp instrument)11. The latter is used in the production of sashimi since the reduced stress to the fish results in better flesh quality.

Some modern trawlers use electrical systems to immobilise fish for health and safety reasons (fish that are not struggling are safer for workers to process), to ensure higher quality, or more accurate filleting12. However, even though fish may be immobilised they may still be conscious and able to feel pain. These systems could be adapted to deliver an effective stun13.

How are wild fish affected by factory farming?

Given that many of the fish species farmed are carnivorous, fish farming is a major driver of the sheer numbers of wild-caught fish disappearing from our oceans.

  • Around 17 million tonnes (22% in weight) of all wild fish caught in 2022 were landed specifically for reduction to fishmeal and oil, the great majority of it used for farm animal feed14. This consists of around 0.5-1 trillion fish. The actual number may be higher since many fisheries are indiscriminate in their catches15.
  • According to industry figures, 75% of fish oil is used in aquaculture feeds16, 70% of fishmeal is used in aquaculture, while over 22% is used in pig feed and 6% in chicken feed17.
  • Feeding wild caught fish to farmed fish is extremely wasteful and inefficient, as it results in less food for people overall. When fishmeal is fed to farm animals, 60-86% of the protein content is likely to be lost to the human food chain. According to one study, only 28% of the protein fed to farmed salmon ends up in human-edible food18. The study also calculated figures for chickens (37%), pigs (21%), trout (22%), whiteleg shrimp (22%), pangasius (17%) and giant tiger prawn (14%), all of whom may consume fishmeal in their diet, especially the fish and crustaceans.
  • 90% of fishmeal and oil comes from food-grade species19 which means they can be, and are, eaten by people. Farm animals, including farmed fish, are competing with people for food and wasting valuable resources.
  • Fishmeal production is mainly sourced from forage (i.e. low in the marine food chain) fish species that play a vital role in ecosystems. This means that huge numbers of fish are taken from the seas that would otherwise be food for large fish, marine mammals and seabirds, putting their populations at risk20.
  • The inclusion of fishmeal and oil in the diet has potential negative health consequences. Examples would be the transfer of toxic substances such as PCBs, dioxins, and pesticides into farmed fish21; antibiotic resistance genes and human potential pathogenic bacteria have been found in fishmeal samples22; and fish feed may be contaminated with microplastics23.
pile of dead anchovies

 

Reducing overfishing 

Taking the pressure of wild fish populations and catching considerably less fish is essential for the future health of our oceans. Reducing the activity of industrial fisheries worldwide would have many benefits.

  • Allowing fish stocks to recover means giving marine life the chance to thrive, in addition to the human communities that depend on them. In particular, avoiding industrial catches off Africa would leave more fish for small-scale fishers and direct human consumption.
  • Lowering fishing carbon emissions by reducing the energy expended.
  • Allowing fish to grow larger before they are caught which means less animal suffering per tonne of fish caught.

Supporting the development of humane capture and slaughter techniques is likely to improve the quality of the product, by reducing stress and injury. This would also prevent suffering for hundreds of billions of fish during the slaughter process each year.

Link to the relevant Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)

  • SDG 14: Life below water. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development24.
  1. Fishcount. Estimated wild-caught finfish numbers (2003 to 2022).
  2. Mood, A., Lara, E., Boyland, N. K., & Brooke, P. (2023). Estimating global numbers of farmed fishes killed for food annually from 1990 to 2019. Animal welfare32, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.4
  3. FAO (2024). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024.
  4. FAO (2024). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024.
  5. Fish caught for reduction to fish oil and fishmeal | fishcount.org.uk
  6. Mood, A. (2010). Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish.
  7. WOAH (2012). Welfare aspects of stunning and killing of farmed fish for human consumption.
  8. Van de Vis and Kestin, 1996. Killing of fishes: literature study and practice observations (field research) report.
  9. EFSA (2005). Aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. The EFSA Journal, 292, pp.1-46.
  10. Pereira, J and Lourenco, S. (2014). What We Do To Kill an Octopus. Cephsinaction. 
  11. Gregory, N.G. and Grandin, T., 1998. Animal welfare and meat science (No. 636.08947 G7). CABI Pub.
  12. SINTEF, 2016. Better fish welfare means better quality. SINTEF news.
  13. Mood, A., Brooke, P. (2019). Towards a strategy for humane fishing in the UK.
  14. FAO (2024). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024.
  15. Cashion, T., Le Manach, F., Zeller, D. and Pauly, D., 2017. Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food‐grade fish. Fish and Fisheries, 18(5), pp.837-844.
  16. Auchterlonie (2018) cited in FAO (2018) The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018.
  17. IFFO, 2016. IFFO Fishmeal and Fish Oil Statistical Yearbook 2016 cited in Seafish, 2016, Fishmeal and fishoil facts and figures.
  18. Fry, J.P., Mailloux, N.A., Love, D.C., Milli, M.C. and Cao, L., 2018. Feed conversion efficiency in aquaculture: do we measure it correctly?. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), p.024017.
  19. Cashion, T., Le Manach, F., Zeller, D. and Pauly, D., 2017. Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food‐grade fish. Fish and Fisheries, 18(5), pp.837-844.
  20. Jahncke, J., Checkley Jr, D.M. and Hunt Jr, G.L., 2004. Trends in carbon flux to seabirds in the Peruvian upwelling system: effects of wind and fisheries on population regulation. Fisheries oceanography, 13(3), pp.208-223.
  21. Jacobs, M.N., Covaci, A. and Schepens, P., 2002. Investigation of selected persistent organic pollutants in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), salmon aquaculture feed, and fish oil components of the feed. Environmental science & technology, 36(13), pp.2797-2805.
  22. Han, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Chen, J., Lu, H. and Liu, G., 2017. Fishmeal application induces antibiotic resistance gene propagation in mariculture sediment. Environmental science & technology, 51(18), pp.10850-10860.
  23. Lusher, A., Hollman, P. and Mendoza-Hill, J., 2017. Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture: status of knowledge on their occurrence and implications for aquatic organisms and food safety. FAO.
  24. United Nations Department of Economic Social Affairs Sustainable Development.
Globe

You are using an outdated browser which we do not support. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

If you have any further questions regarding this, or any other matter, please get in touch with us at supporters@ciwf.org.uk. We aim to respond to all queries within two working days. However, due to the high volume of correspondence that we receive, it may occasionally take a little longer. Please do bear with us if this is the case. Alternatively, if your query is urgent, you can contact our Supporter Engagement Team on +44 (0)1483 521 953 (lines open Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm).